Art Of Conversation

Art Of Conversation

Share this post

Art Of Conversation
Art Of Conversation
Why Facts Without Values Are Dangerous
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Features

Why Facts Without Values Are Dangerous

How following the facts without a preferred destination can lead us into hell.

Matthew Morgan's avatar
Matthew Morgan
Feb 25, 2022
∙ Paid

Share this post

Art Of Conversation
Art Of Conversation
Why Facts Without Values Are Dangerous
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

The character of Ian Malcolm, Jeff Goldblum’s rock-star mathematician in Jurassic Park, is remarkably Nietzschean. He’s accurate in his prescient pessimism; he’s ignored when his warnings should be taken seriously; he is a human vending-machine of aphorisms. He gave us:

“Life finds a way.”

And, “What you call discovery, I call the rape of the natural world.”

And, “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.”

In this last line, however, he is less Nietzsche and more David Hume, the philosopher who described what is known as the “is-ought problem”. This is the claim that we can’t derive an “ought” (prescribed behaviour) from an “is” (the described universe). The scientists could clone dinosaurs, but that did not mean that they should.

I’m no philosopher, but it seems to me that you can get an “ought” from two statements of what is. Take a desired outcome, add to it a fact or facts of the physical universe, and hey presto – a g…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Art Of Conversation to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Matthew Morgan
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More